This should help convince pro-lifers not to vote for Giuliani...
In a phone interview with the Huffington Post, NARAL's political director Elizabeth Shipp acknowledged it "would help" the pro-choice movement if a Republican proved it was possible to win the presidency while still supporting abortion rights."The Republican Party used to be about the conservative principles of limited government intervention in private life," Shipp said. "It seems to me if they went back to that and stood out from the rigid mainstream, anti-choice agenda, I think yeah, it would be good for the movement."
Could Giuliani be the candidate to take the Republican Party down that road? And would NARAL support him?
"I don't know yet," said Shipp. "He has said some very concerning things since getting into this race. If you have to grade him compared to everyone else you have to give him an incomplete."
The National Abortion Rights Action League (who won't even use the "abortion" in their name since they recognize people don't like abortion) recognizes that a pro-abortion Republican winning the Presidency would be a good thing for their movement, so, ipso facto, it would be bad for those who defend innocent life. We must work as strongly (or even more strongly) against Giuliani as we would any pro-abortion Democrat.
Hat Tip: The Corner